Pedagogical Philosophies of Teacher Educators in the Philippines: Implications for Teacher Quality

Authors

  • Hardin La Ramba St. Paul University Philippines, Cagayan, Philippines
  • Amirkhon Yorov International Postgraduate Students of the University of Muhammadiyah Malang from Gambia, West Africa
  • Muthoifin Muthoifin University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Central Java Indonesia
  • Mariam Elbann Department of Islamic Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia; and Faculty of Law, Tanta University, Egypt

Keywords:

Pedagogical Philosophy, Teacher Educators, Teacher Quality, Pragmatic Constructivism, Teacher Education in the Philippines

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the pedagogical philosophies of teacher educators in the Ilocos Region, Philippines, to understand their implications for teacher quality amid national reforms. The research sought to identify espoused philosophies, categorize them into distinct profiles, and analyze their variation across educator and institutional characteristics. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed to analyze survey data from 391 teacher educators. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses was combined with quantitative profiling and cross-tabulations to map the pedagogical landscape. The results revealed a dominant model of "Pragmatic Constructivism with Cultural Grounding," emphasizing theory-practice integration (33.7%), experiential learning (31.8%), and authentic contexts (23.4%). An eclectic approach was the most common profile (57.3%). A significant "experience paradox" emerged: pedagogical sophistication declines as teaching experience increases, while no significant differences were found across institutional types. The study concludes that although teacher educators' philosophies align with evidence-based practices, the experience paradox poses a significant threat to the sustained implementation of pedagogical innovation. Improving teacher quality requires intentional institutional strategies, such as intergenerational learning communities and support for novice-led innovation, to ensure progressive pedagogies are maintained and integrated system-wide.

References

[1] J. Loughran, “Professionally Developing as a Teacher Educator,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 271–283, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0022487114533386.

[2] L. Darling-Hammond, “Constructing 21st-century teacher education,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 300–314, 2006, doi: 10.1177/0022487105285962.

[3] L. C. Alia, E. R. J. Magday, and D. R. Palompon, “Development and validation of a cooperating teacher mentoring scale for student teachers,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2381–2388, 2025, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v14i3.31565.

[4] C. Ping, G. Schellings, and D. Beijaard, “Teacher educators’ professional learning: A literature review,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 75, pp. 93–104, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.003.

[5] M. Lunenberg, F. Korthagen, and A. Swennen, “The teacher educator as a role model,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 586–601, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001.

[6] N. M. D. Borbon et al., “Exploring the Lived Experiences of Teachers with International Macro Exposure: Impacts on Professional Identity, Pedagogy, and Global Educational Perspectives,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 480–499, 2025, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.24.3.23.

[7] J. C. G. Tolentino, L. R. Valenzuela, and S. L. Cruz, “Research Experience through the Lens of Undergraduate Filipino Pre-Service Physical Educators: An Interpretative Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 306–326, 2024, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.6.14.

[8] Y. Zeegers, “Curriculum development for teacher education in the Southern Philippines: A simultaneous process of professional learning and syllabus enhancement,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 207–213, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.01.015.

[9] E. Ronda, D. A. Collades, D. Danipog, and M. Chavez, “Enabling and constraining factors in sustaining lesson study as a professional learning activity of teachers in the Philippines,” Int. J. Lesson Learn. Stud., pp. 1–14, 2026, doi: 10.1108/IJLLS-07-2025-0192.

[10] V. N. Tarrayo, R. R. Potestades, and M. B. Ulla, “Exploring the Gender Perspective in English Language Teaching (ELT): Voices from ELT Practitioners in Philippine Higher Education Institutions,” Sex. Cult., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1634–1652, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12119-021-09840-x.

[11] V. N. Tarrayo, “Navigating the gender dimensions in English language teaching: perceptions of senior high school teachers in the Philippines,” Pedagog. Cult. Soc., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 933–953, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14681366.2021.1966080.

[12] F. Korthagen, J. Loughran, and T. Russell, “Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1020–1041, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022.

[13] A. C. Sabijon and G. B. Parcia, “Breaking Routines: The Lived Experiences of Solo Parents Navigating Modular Distance Learning in the Philippines,” J. Curric. Teach., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 131–148, 2025, doi: 10.5430/jct.v14n3p131.

[14] J. V Cleofas and M. F. Mijares, “The role of professional self-care practices in lowering anxiety among Filipino teachers enrolled in graduate studies,” Teach. Dev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 206–220, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13664530.2022.2043422.

[15] M. M. J. Olvido, F. T. Dayagbil, R. C. Alda, B. J. Uytico, and K. F. R. Rodriguez, “An exploration of the quality of graduates of Philippine teacher education institutions,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1235261.

[16] et al Shepard, L.A., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., “Jossey-Bass. Preparing Teachers for a Changing World,” 2005.

[17] A. Hargreaves, “Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 967–983, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.007.

[18] J. Murray and T. Male, “Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from the field,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 125–142, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.006.

[19] L. Haixia, M. Koehler, and L. Wang, “The Impact of Teachers’ Beliefs on Their Different Uses of Technology,” Soc. Inf. Technol. Teach. Educ. Int. Conf., no. 2000, pp. 1468–1477, 2018.

[20] L. Darling-hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, “Title Professional Develo p ment,” India Rev., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2017.

[21] M. J. Nathan and A. Petrosino, “Expert Blind Spot Among Preservice Teachers,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 905–928, 2003, doi: 10.3102/00028312040004905.

[22] C. G. Zara, “Exploring the application of academic leadership skills in teacher education institutions, Philippines: basis for institutional sustainability and innovation,” Front. Educ., vol. 11, 2026, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2026.1724487.

[23] G. L. Concepcion, “State-facilitated development support: Precursor to higher education teachers’ positive professional outlook,” Environ. Soc. Psychol., vol. 10, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.59429/esp.v10i2.3261.

[24] H. T. Lumapenet and M. A. Agarcio, “Financial stability towards instructional behaviour and work fulfilment of teachers in the Philippines,” Int. J. Knowl. Learn., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 291–318, 2025, doi: 10.1504/IJKL.2025.145985.

[25] S. Hallam et al., “Are there gender differences in instrumental music practice?,” Psychol. Music, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 116–130, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305735616650994.

[26] D. Osborne, “The promise of English: benevolent assimilation, education, and nationalism in the Philippines,” J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 581–594, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01434632.2019.1711101.

[27] R. B. J. L. Christensen, Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches, vol. 11, no. 1. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

[28] P. Leavy, Research Design, vol. 11, no. 1. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

[29] Sholihul Anwar, Rahmat Setiawan, Sukisno, and Abdulrohim E-sor, “Navigating Changes In The Digital Learning Environment For Islamic Education Leadership,” J. Pedagog., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 09–18, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.63889/pedagogy.v18i1.249.

[30] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

[31] A. B. I. Bernardo, “Exploring Filipino adolescents’ perceptions of the legitimacy of parental authority over academic behaviors,” J. Appl. Dev. Psychol., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 273–280, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.003.

[32] M. K. L. Duran and K. A. Mariñas, “Sustainability Integration in Philippine Higher Education Curricula: A Structural Equation Modeling Assessing Teacher Intention to Integrate,” Sustain. , vol. 16, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16093677.

[33] N. J. Castulo, A. C. Marasigan, H. B. Macahilig, N. M. A. Serafico-Reyes, and E. T. Taddese, “From classrooms to cross-borders: early childhood educator preparation in the Philippines and its influence on migration decisions,” Front. Sociol., vol. 10, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1643165.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

La Ramba, H., Yorov , A., Muthoifin, M., & Elbann, M. (2026). Pedagogical Philosophies of Teacher Educators in the Philippines: Implications for Teacher Quality. JURNAL PEDAGOGY, 19(1), 65–79. Retrieved from https://jurnal.staimuhblora.ac.id/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/356